Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

نویسندگان

  • C F Chong
  • M I W Adi
  • A Thien
  • A Suyoi
  • A J Mackie
  • A S Tin
  • S Tripathi
  • N H Jaman
  • K K Tan
  • K Y Kok
  • V V Mathew
  • O Paw
  • H B Chua
  • S K Yapp
چکیده

INTRODUCTION Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies. The Alvarado and modified Alvarado scores have been developed to aid diagnosis, but both scoring systems have poor sensitivity and specificity when applied in Middle Eastern and Asian populations. The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system that is suitable for the local population. METHODS Clinical data from 312 patients who had undergone an emergency appendicectomy was retrospectively collected and used to generate 15 parameters. The probability was calculated and a score of 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 was allocated to each parameter. The receiver operating curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new scoring system were derived using the StatsDirect statistical software. RESULTS The 15 parameters and the scores generated were age (less than 40 years is 1 point; greater than 40 years is 0.5 point), gender (male is 1 point; female is 0.5 point), right iliac fossa (RIF) pain (0.5 point), migration of pain to RIF (0.5 point), nausea and vomiting (1 point), anorexia (1 point), duration of symptoms (less than 48 hours is 1 point; more than 48 hours is 0.5 point), RIF tenderness (1 point), guarding (2 points), rebound tenderness (1 point), Rovsing's sign (2 points), fever (1 point), raised white cell count (1 point), negative urinalysis (1 point) and foreign national registration identity card (1 point). The optimal cut-off threshold score from the ROC was 7.5, with a sensitivity of 88 percent, a specificity of 67 percent, a PPV of 93 percent and an NPV of 53 percent. The negative appendicectomy rate decreased significantly from 16.3 percent to 6.9 percent, which was a 9.4 percent reduction (p is 0.0007). CONCLUSION The new appendicitis scoring system looked promising when applied to our settings, and had a better sensitivity and specificity than the Alvarado score when applied to Asian populations. A significant reduction in the negative appendicectomy rate was also predicted. A prospective evaluation of this new appendicitis scoring system, referred to as the RIPASA score, is ongoing.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Investigation Study the Specificity and Sensitivity of Ripasa and Alvarado Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Patients Referred to Shaheed Rajaee Hospital [2016-2018]

Introduction: Appendicitis is one of the most prevalent causes of abdominal pain requiring surgery. Diagnosis of appendicitis is one of the important challenges of surgeons in emergency care. Delay in the diagnosis of appendicitis is associated with an increase in disability and mortality. The timely and correct diagnosis of appendicitis is necessary to reduce the complications of appendicitis ...

متن کامل

A Comparitive Study of Alvarado Score And Ripasa Score in the Diagnosis Of Acute Appendicitis

Acute Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies in clinical practice with estimated life time prevalence approximately 1 in 7. [1] The incidence is 1.5 to 1.9 per 1000 and is approximately 1.4 times greater in men then in women. [2] Aim: This study was undertaken to compare Alvarado and RIPASA score to diagnose acute appendicitis ,to know the efficacy of individual score for e...

متن کامل

Which One is Better? Comparison of the Acute Inflammatory Response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado Scoring Systems

Purpose Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of an acute abdomen. The accuracies of the Alvarado and the acute inflammatory response (AIR) scores in the diagnosis of appendicitis is very low in Asian populations, so a new scoring system, the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) system, was designed recently. We applied and compared the Alvarado, AIR, and RI...

متن کامل

Diagnostic Importance of Alvarado and RIPASA Score in Acute Appendicitis

Introduction: One of the most common surgical emergencies encountered in the day to day practice both in developed and developing countries in the world is acute appendicitis. The incidence may range from 13% to 77%. The diagnosis is purely based on clinical history, examination and ultrasonography. Many studies are available about the diagnostic methods used for acute appendicitis in western p...

متن کامل

Comparison of Ripasa and Alvarado scoring systems in diagnosis of acute appendicitis

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mainly based on clinical examination and various diagnostic scores are available. We compared Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and their negative appendectomy rate in 100 patients of appendicitis.

متن کامل

Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION The accuracy of the Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis in an Asian population has been disappointingly low. We prospectively compared the RIPASA score with the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODS 200 consecutive patients who presented to the Accident and Emergency Department with right iliac fossa pain were recruited in the study. Both the...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Singapore medical journal

دوره 51 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010